The Destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah
by John Martin (1852)
Portrait Version in The
Memory Page Online Study Bible
Original version source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:John_Martin_-_Sodom_and_Gomorrah.jpg
What normally would have been a ten minute exercise turned into a
one week saga. The public domain pictures I've been incorporating
from http://thebiblerevival.com/clipart40.htm
have been great, but the Sodom and Gomorrah picture was not
suitable. Granted, the pictures are not part of the original text
so there of course is a lot of room for artistic freedom, but the
picture should not contradict the text or be otherwise misleading.
I'm actually checking all of the pictures in this way rather than
just slapping them in. Anyway, the Sodom and Gomorrah picture from
the usual source reflects the traditional story that Lot barely
escaped. But what does the scripture say?
" 'Haste thee, escape thither; for
I cannot do any thing till thou be come thither.' Therefore the
name of the
city was called Zoar." - v.22
Yes, the angels were in a hurry to carry out God's instructions,
but they were not allowed to start until Lot got all the way to
the city of Zoar. The exact locations of Sodom, Gomorrah, and Zoar
are unknown, but they were all cities of the plain and probably at
least several
miles apart. So the pictures of Lot escaping with the flames
licking them from behind are exciting - but misleading.
I found John Martin's 1852 painting to be a suitable picture to
use for the Genesis 19
page. This famous painting emphasizes the true horror of the
destruction - and the seriousness of sin. However, there were
still a couple of issues: 1) the picture is landscape instead of
portrait, and 2) although Zoar is pictured it still looks too
close to Sodom (or Gomorrah). So I decided to take the unusual
step of taking the time to gently alter the picture. It took me
several days to do this. The foreground of Zoar was enlarged and
relocated to simultaneously 1) make the picture taller instead of
wider, and 2) make Zoar appear just a bit farther away from Sodom
- maybe not far enough, but at least closer to reality, as far as
we know.
A couple of additional cautions: 1) The destruction happened in
the daytime (v.23). It's certainly possible that the sulfur smoke
made the whole area dark like night, but don't let the darkness of
the picture make you assume it's night. 2) In John Martin's
version, Zoar appears to be in a higher elevation. This could very
well be true, but it still should be considered a plain city and
definitely not high in the mountains (v.19,20). The modified
picture tries to de-emphasize the "height" of Zoar a bit.
Pictures can be a terrific memory aid, and can also evoke powerful
emotions to make the Bible more real, but don't let the pictures
lock you in to a certain interpretation! Read the actual text, and
meditate on it, and let that be the ultimate authority. By all
means use the picture, but "animate" it in your mind with the
facts you've learned from the actual text.
-- Kevin North, March 24, 2013